Data release countdown: 22 days to go

There are just three weeks left until the reference samples are released. A quick recap of the timeline:

  • 01st Jul: reference samples go live
  • 01st Aug: submission portal opens
  • 30th Sep: submission portal closes

How are the reference samples accessed?

You need to register and allow us the option to email you. Then, on Wed 01st Jul, you will receive an email that gives you a link and a password to access the reference samples. From there you can download them and get to work.

Any questions, don’t hesitate to ask: factor@lancaster.ac.uk.

Guess which one I am…

Globally, enormous sums of money are being thrown at generative AI, including methods of creation and of detection – but it’s fair to say that the majority is being steered towards, if not explicitly ring-fenced for STEM (science, technology, engineering, maths). Natural language processing and machine learning. Audio-engineering. Software and hardware development. Data science. If you’re in one of these fields, life probably looks very busy right now. Possibly even a little daunting.

However, HackaCon’s core point is that generating spontaneous, human-like conversations using AI fundamentally requires SHAPE (social sciences, humanities, and the arts for people and the economy). You’re going to need linguists. Creative writers. Psychologists. Sociologists. Philosophers. Historians.

Thankfully we have the inimitable Katherine Parkinson on hand to help illustrate this. Continue reading

Ignore all previous instructions…

Historically, when it came to deciding whether we were interacting with a human or a computer, we had the Turing Test. Created in 1949 by Alan Turing himself, there was once even a prize for whoever could create an artificial conversational entity (ACE) capable of successfully duping enough of the judges into believing that they were chatting with a real person.

As fate would have it, interest in the Turing Test ebbed, the prize became defunct, and feverish reports on Star Trek-style computers that could interact with us just like humans dwindled.

Seventy-five years later, however, the problem migrated off the pages of far-fetched sci-fi novels and it has now flooded across most, if not all social media platforms. Facebook, Instagram, X, Reddit, TikTok, and even – or perhaps especially – LinkedIn are now drowning under AI-generated content from accounts posing as humans, turning what used to be an after-dinner academic conversation piece into an irritating continual Bot or Not? sanity check.

But one thing has evolved: instead of the Turing Test, we now have… Continue reading